Is retweeting an unfounded rumor the same as shouting fire in a crowded theater? Are you specifically endorsing a post that you share? What about Caveat emptor..or let the receiver beware? Interesting legal responsibilities unique to our times.
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
Archives
- December 2022
- October 2018
- December 2017
- June 2017
- April 2017
- August 2016
- April 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
Categories
Meta
Could it also be that the model that governs the spread of epidemics also govern the spread of rumours and innuendo on social networks?
That’s a great idea. I wonder if there is a science behind following the spread of tweets or viral videos.
There probably is but the million dollar question is what are the properties of an especially virulent social pathogen. Been thinking about it since I read your post. Alas, the good lord has given me the horns to ask the questions, but not the wings to seek the answers with 🙂
I used to run a daily electronic newsletter called Essential News Links and the posting philosophy I employ today follows the editorial philosophy I employed with the newsletter – I don’t always post because I agree with what I’m posting. I post because I find what I’m posting to be thought provoking. That which I post is as likely to come from The American Conservative as The Huffington Post.
Pfft..what are wings without horns? The security guys probably have algorithms worked out for the spread and damage of computer viruses, I’m guessing?
Todd Settimo , thought provoking topics are good all around. But what about sharing news of a terrorist attack or natural disaster that could trigger panic. In such a case, there may not be time/resources to verify it. So it seems harsh to penalize someone for passing along something they thought was true. Perhaps it is time for common sense guidelines on social responsibilities online.
I agree. You first. 😉
(sorry for the flippancy…it’s just that in my 30 year IT career, I’ve been embroiled in some of the most hotly contested discussions which began with the words ‘We should set out some common sense standards.’ “Common sense,” as Voltaire said, “is not so common.”)
Uncommon sense, then! Actually, I tried to think of some but they sounded trite or obvious. Such as trust, but verify.
I think all too often what needs to be said isn’t because it seems obvious. But what’s obvious to some aren’t to many others. Reagan’s dictum toward Soviet disarmament really does apply here.